🎥 Camera Monitoring in Coding Tests: Is It Still Relevant in the AI Era?
Remote coding assessments often require webcam monitoring to prevent cheating and impersonation. But in the AI era—where tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot assist developers daily—many engineers question whether camera-monitored coding tests are still relevant.
Over the past few years, remote coding assessments have become a standard part of the software engineering hiring process. Platforms like HackerRank, Coderbyte, and Turing often require candidates to enable webcam monitoring during technical tests.
The goal is straightforward: ensure fairness and prevent cheating.
But in 2026 we are firmly in the AI era, where tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot are used daily by developers around the world.
So the question arises:
Does camera monitoring during coding tests still make sense today?
Let’s explore both sides of the debate.
Why Companies Still Use Camera Monitoring
1. Preventing Cheating in Remote Assessments
Before remote hiring became common, technical interviews were conducted in person. Recruiters could easily verify that the candidate solving the problem was the same person who applied.
With remote testing, things are different.
Camera monitoring helps detect situations such as:
- Another person assisting the candidate
- The candidate leaving the desk frequently
- Multiple people appearing in the webcam
- Suspicious behavior during the test
In essence, the webcam acts as a digital proctor.
2. Avoiding Proxy Test Takers
One of the biggest challenges in remote developer hiring is impersonation.
Some candidates have been known to:
- Hire another developer to take the test
- Share the screen with someone else
- Receive real-time assistance from external sources
Camera monitoring reduces this risk by verifying who is actually taking the assessment.
3. AI Makes Cheating Easier
The rise of AI coding tools has changed the landscape.
Today a candidate could simply:
- Copy the coding question
- Paste it into an AI assistant
- Submit the generated answer
Without monitoring, it becomes difficult to determine whether the candidate actually understands the solution.
Camera monitoring therefore acts as a deterrent against misuse of AI tools.
Why Many Developers Think Camera Monitoring Is Outdated
Despite these reasons, a growing number of engineers believe that camera-monitored coding tests are becoming obsolete.
1. Real Developers Use AI Every Day
Modern developers frequently rely on tools such as:
- ChatGPT
- GitHub Copilot
These tools help with:
- Writing boilerplate code
- Debugging complex problems
- Generating documentation
- Exploring alternative solutions
Testing developers without AI access creates an environment that does not reflect real-world engineering workflows.
Testing developers without AI is like testing a carpenter without tools.
2. Algorithm Puzzles Are Losing Relevance
Traditional coding tests often focus on:
- Algorithm puzzles
- Edge cases
- Syntax memorization
But AI tools can generate these solutions almost instantly.
Companies are now shifting focus toward skills AI cannot easily replace:
- System design
- Debugging complex systems
- Architecture decisions
- Understanding trade-offs
3. Privacy and Candidate Experience
Camera monitoring can feel intrusive for many candidates.
Common concerns include:
- Privacy issues
- Continuous recording
- False cheating flags
- Higher interview stress
For many developers, the experience feels more like surveillance than evaluation.
4. Strong Developers Often Avoid These Tests
Senior engineers often have multiple opportunities available.
When they encounter strict proctoring requirements such as:
- Webcam monitoring
- Locked browsers
- Screen recording
They may simply decline to participate.
Companies risk losing highly skilled candidates if the hiring process feels overly restrictive.
The Future of Developer Assessments
The developer hiring process is gradually evolving.
Instead of heavily monitored coding tests, companies are exploring more practical evaluation methods.
1. Live Pair Programming
Candidates solve problems while collaborating with an interviewer.
2. Take-Home Projects
Developers build small real-world features in their own development environment.
3. System Design Interviews
Focus shifts toward architecture and engineering trade-offs.
4. AI-Assisted Coding
Candidates may use AI tools but must clearly explain the reasoning behind their code.
The New Skill: AI Collaboration
The most valuable developers today are not those who avoid AI—but those who know how to use it effectively.
Important skills include:
- Writing effective AI prompts
- Verifying AI-generated code
- Detecting AI mistakes
- Refactoring generated solutions
- Understanding how the code works
In other words, the future developer is someone who can collaborate with AI, not compete against it.
Final Thoughts
Camera monitoring in coding assessments was introduced to maintain fairness in remote hiring.
However, the rapid advancement of AI coding tools is forcing companies to rethink how developers are evaluated.
Instead of asking:
Can this candidate solve algorithm puzzles alone?
Companies are increasingly asking:
Can this candidate solve real problems using modern tools?
As the industry evolves, hiring practices will likely shift from strict surveillance toward practical skill evaluation.
The goal will no longer be to eliminate tools—but to see how effectively developers use them.